14731390_10157618962685273_4510994480024841161_n (1).jpg


My name is Bashir Mohamed.
I live in Edmonton

Canadian Exceptionalism and Understanding Black Lives Matter

Canadian Exceptionalism and Understanding Black Lives Matter

Black Lives Matter Toronto co-founder Yusra Khogali speaking at a rally. Source: blog.to

Black Lives Matter Toronto co-founder Yusra Khogali speaking at a rally. Source: blog.to


On January 27, 2017, the United States President signed Executive Order 13769, popularly known as the ‘Muslim ban’. The order, in effect, banned legal visa owners from seven muslim majority countries from entering the US. Legal residents were denied entry, families were unable to reunite and people wondered what was next.

Thankfully, the move was immediately challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and an emergency order stopped the ban from being implemented. Immediately, local groups in Canada organized actions in solidarity. One particular protest was held on February 4 by Black Lives Matter Toronto, with support from Idle No More, The Chinese Canadian National Council and No One Is Illegal. They demanded that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemn the Muslim ban (which continues to affect Muslim Canadians), repeal the Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act, and end the Safe Third Country Agreement with the United States.

Initially, it seemed like the Canadian government was about to take action. The Prime Minister’s office sent out a response on Twitter that received nearly half a million retweets. This message received widespread media coverage, and there was a global perception that Trudeau would condemn the Muslim ban.


However, this did not happen. At a hastily organized press conference the next day, Trudeau and his ministers said that they would not condemn the ban and that no additional actions would be taken to support refugees affected by the ban. This lack of action shocked many Canadians, especially communities and organizations that work directly with refugees.

During the February 4 protest, Black Lives Matter Toronto co-founder Yusra Khogali delivered a short speech in reference to a terrorist’s deadly attack on a Quebec City mosque.

When this shooting happened, there was a hashtag that went viral on social media saying that we need to pray for Quebec City. Quebec City is a white supremacist settler colony.*

When Justin Trudeau responded to the Muslim ban that this coward, this white supremacist coward, Donald Trump, put forward, what did Justin Trudeau say? He said he wanted to accept everyone who is not allowed into the US border to Canada.

Don’t cheer! Do not cheer, because we know what exactly that is. We know what that manipulation is.

It is what this country is founded on: erasure and silencing of the real history of this land: the genocide of indigenous people on which this state is founded on, the enslavement and genocide of black people on which this state founded on, the indentured slavery of racialized people on which this state is founded on.

When Justin Trudeau says that, he is a liar, he is a hypocrite, he is a white supremacist terrorist. That is what he is. Do not be fooled by this Liberal bullshit.

When mayor John Tory said that Toronto is a sanctuary for refugees, when black people are being murdered in the city, we have questions: What happened to Andrew Loku? What happened to Jermaine Carby? What happened to Abdirahman Abdi?

How is the city a sanctuary when black people are being murdered so mercilessly?
— Yusra Khogali

*Quebec City openly practiced slavery as recently as the mid-1800s.

Yusra’s remarks led to a media backlash where pundits called for her resignation, condemned the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement and called BLM “the next KKK”. Most articles chose to focus their attention on her comment about Trudeau being a “white supremacist terrorist”. Not one major article properly recognized or conveyed the context of her speech. Nor did they choose to actually evaluate her words. The media was not interested in her message; they were interested only in the way she delivered it.

Her message was straightforward. Trudeau's refusal to condemn the US President’s Islamophobic rhetoric reiterates the oppression and suffering of Muslim-Americans and Muslim-Canadians. In addition, the worldwide assumption that the Canadian government did openly oppose the ban reinforces the myth of Canadian exceptionalism, by which Canadians and onlookers believe that Canada and its values are superior to our neighbours to the south. This myth is extremely dangerous because it inhibits proper discussions around race and discrimination in our own country.

We conveniently forget about discriminatory legislation such as Bill C-51 (Anti-terrorism Act) or Bill S-7 (Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act). We blame tragedies like the terrorist attack in Quebec on divisive American politics while remaining willfully ignorant of our own toxic attitudes towards those considered outsiders. We also refuse to acknowledge that Canada was built on the exclusion and discrimination of groups such as Indigenous populations, Japanese communities, and black and Chinese immigrants.

Regardless of intentions, Trudeau’s inaction did nothing to help Muslim-Canadians. Rather, his initial misdirection damaged relationships between the government and civil society by making it easier for the general Canadian public to blame Canadian problems on the United States.

This frustration with our leadership is where Yusra’s comments originate. And in this context, her comments makes sense. As a society, we should seek to understand the perspectives of those calling for help rather than focusing on the inconveniences of their delivery. The key to solving a problem is recognizing that it exists.

I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Councilor or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.”
— Martin Luther King, Jr.
On Refugees: Reflections from the 2017 JACAC Student Forum

On Refugees: Reflections from the 2017 JACAC Student Forum

At the Expense of International Students

At the Expense of International Students